Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: wrong fds used for refilenodes after pg_upgrade relfilenode changes Reply-To:
Date: 2022-05-14 00:07:05
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+ErW5HZqy-z_30TJGdek75m=hGoPXZW2ixmrEvLL_9VQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 3:33 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This seems fine, but I think you should add a non-trivial comment about it.

Thanks for looking. Done, and pushed. Let's see if 180s per query is enough...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2022-05-14 00:35:53 Re: Making JIT more granular
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-05-13 23:29:04 Re: Correct comment in ProcedureCreate() for pgstat_create_function() call.