Re: allow_in_place_tablespaces vs. pg_basebackup

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: allow_in_place_tablespaces vs. pg_basebackup
Date: 2023-03-28 18:18:48
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+D6_uXiRhOt5OO8hsWfJ1JCWARkR_BBuiMqgb1d1XAMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 5:15 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I guess we should add a test of -Fp too, to keep it working?

Oops, that was already tested in existing tests, so I take that back.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-03-28 18:19:30 Re: "variable not found in subplan target list"
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-03-28 18:15:17 Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns