Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Date: 2024-03-23 00:45:28
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+CR05ACFujUbeAd-yM+nNJBSpnyB=q3vbriCJuoSu9Ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 6:26 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> conftest.c:139:5: error: no previous prototype for 'does_int64_work' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 139 | int does_int64_work()
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> configure:17003: $? = 1
> configure: program exited with status 1

. o O ( int64_t, PRIdi64, etc were standardised a quarter of a century ago )

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2024-03-23 01:22:21 Re: sublink [exists (select xxx group by grouping sets ())] causes an assertion error
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2024-03-23 00:26:07 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring