From: | aa <ghevge(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is there any chance to get some kind of a result set sifting mechanism in Postgres? |
Date: | 2024-05-13 13:35:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+hGcwLz4LDHN+fzk=HEMnhXXchkZkHRXZB6s5DonTJktKMfYw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
If you call the action of "sifting" ordering, then yes. If you don't call
it ordering, then no.
In essence, is the output of a filtering mechanism, done in a single result
set pass. And this pass should be the same pass in charge of collecting the
result set in the first place.
Thanks
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:48 AM Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do I interpret your idea correctly: You want some sort of ordering without
> ordering?
>
> Kind regards
> WW
>
> Am Montag, 13. Mai 2024 um 10:40:38 MESZ hat aa <ghevge(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Folgendes geschrieben:
>
>
> Hello Everyone!
>
> Is there any chance to get some kind of a result set sifting mechanism in
> Postgres?
>
> What I am looking for is a way to get for example: "nulls last" in a
> result set, without having to call "order by" or having to use UNION ALL,
> and if possible to get this in a single result set pass.
>
> Something on this line: SELECT a, b, c FROM my_table WHERE a nulls last
> OFFSET 0 LIMIT 25
>
> I don't want to use order by or union all because these are time consuming
> operations, especially on large data sets and when comparations are done
> on dynamic values (eg: geolocation distances in between a mobile and a
> static location)
>
> What I would expect from such a feature, will be speeds comparable with
> non sorted selects, while getting a very rudimentary ordering.
>
> A use case for such a mechanism will be the implementation of QUICK
> relevant search results for a search engine.
>
> I'm not familiar with how Postgres logic handles simple select queries,
> but the way I would envision a result set sifting logic, would be to
> collect the result set, in 2 separate lists, based on the sifting
> condition, and then concatenate these 2 lists and return the result, when
> the pagination requests conditions are met.
>
> Any idea if such a functionality is feasible ?
>
> Thank you.
>
> PS: if ever implemented, the sifting mechanism could be extended to
> accommodate any type of thresholds, not just null values.
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-05-13 13:37:50 | Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules |
Previous Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2024-05-13 13:10:39 | Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting |