From: | Raghavendra <raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue |
Date: | 2012-02-02 07:01:18 |
Message-ID: | CA+h6AhgKZT_EUOG9ALXW3gowTUNg5jKOvb66ZRgxrt2WdOT=QQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
What is the value of synchronous_commit ?
---
Regards,
Raghavendra
EnterpriseDB Corporation
Blog: http://raghavt.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Venkat Balaji <venkat(dot)balaji(at)verse(dot)in>wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was testing the Postgres-9.1.1 synchronous streaming replication on our
> UAT system.
>
> Without synchronous replication, everything was working fine.
>
> But, when i enabled synchronous_replication_names='*', the "create table"
> started hanging for long time.
>
> When i pressed "Ctrl+C" i got the following message -
>
> Cancel request sent
> WARNING: canceling wait for synchronous replication due to user request
> DETAIL: The transaction has already committed locally, but might not have
> been replicated to the standby.
> CREATE TABLE
>
> Can someone please help us ?
>
> Thanks
> VB
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregg Jaskiewicz | 2012-02-02 07:23:01 | Re: Why Hard-Coded Version 9.1 In Names? |
Previous Message | Venkat Balaji | 2012-02-02 06:51:44 | [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue |