Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Continuous Performance Test

From: Jean Baro <jfbaro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Continuous Performance Test
Date: 2019-08-16 01:33:04
Message-ID: CA+fQeemWOLywzUdMcwjrrkrtZoXmxVfzLRWGkFFFOFY3L3FTpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

No problem!

If I find anything Ill let you know.

Thanks

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, 17:59 Nasby, Jim, <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:

> Ooops, looks like I need to add email rules for this community list! You
> can ignore my AWS-specific comments in the last paragraph. 😊
>
>
>
> *From: *"Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 14, 2019 at 3:57 PM
> *To: *Jean Baro <jfbaro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <
> pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> *Subject: *[UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Continuous Performance Test
>
>
>
> I’m not aware of such a tool, but it would certainly be useful.
>
>
>
> Instead of trying to tie this directly to production changes (at which
> point it’s already too late), I encourage you to tie it into your
> QA/deployment process. If you have a reliable benchmark (a **great**
> accomplishment!) then you should run that as part of your pre-deployment
> process. Obviously that won’t reflect ad-hoc changes to your production
> environment, but frankly you don’t want ad-hoc in production except in an
> emergency (and even then it’s best to have a formal production change
> deployment process so you can track exactly what happened when).
>
>
>
> It does occur to me that it would be handy to be able to flag CloudWatch,
> Performance Insights, and Enhanced Monitoring when a deployment is done.
> That would make it easier to see the actual impact of a deployment on
> production. Let me know if you’re interested in doing a PFR for that.
>
>
>
> *From: *Jean Baro <jfbaro(at)gmail(dot)com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 14, 2019 at 11:19 AM
> *To: *"pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >
> *Subject: *Continuous Performance Test
>
>
>
> Hello!
>
>
>
> I was wondering if there is any external tool or extention to PostgreSQL >
> 10 (EC2 or RDS) which would:
>
> - Collect the TOP X statements (queries or DML) used in the last Y
> days IN PRODUCTION;
> - Everytime there is a change in the DATABASE Structure (Migrations,
> properties, Tables, Indexes) run these TOP X statements against a
> PERFORMANCE TEST DATABASE (Which would be very similar to production, on
> both HARDWARE and DATABASE SIZE)
> - Collect the metrics for these tests
> - Plot the results over time so that the PRODUCT team can be sure how
> the performance of the DATABASE is being affected by the chances over time
> (also as the number of rows changes). Something like this:
>
> Query vs new change to the DATABASE (+ its size). So that we can see which
> migration affect the database the most.
>
>
>
> Is there such a thing? It doesn't need to be open source nor free. But it
> would be good if it is :)
>
>
>
> If the answer is "NO", would it be possible to create such a tool and make
> it available as OOS? I think so, but I would need some professional help
> (and would pay for this).
>
>
>
> Thanks
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mariel Cherkassky 2019-08-18 06:56:35 UPGRADE TO PG11 CAUSED DEGREDATION IN PERFORMANCE
Previous Message Nasby, Jim 2019-08-14 20:59:49 Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Continuous Performance Test