| From: | Jean Baro <jfbaro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA(at)sqlexec(dot)com>, Rick Otten <rottenwindfish(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: High concurrency same row (inventory) |
| Date: | 2019-07-30 00:04:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+fQee=sn-LTt17hVnN3twyAB+MXboPW29nRT0zgchcvsvQLjg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
All the failures come from the Bucket Table (see image below).
I don't have access to the DB, neither the code, but last time I was
presented to the UPDATE it was changing (incrementing or decrementing)
*qty_available*, but tomorrow morning I can be sure, once the developers
and DBAs are back to the office. I know it's quite a simple UPDATE.
Table is called Bucket:
{autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor=0.01}
[image: Bucket.png]
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:12 PM Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com> wrote:
> Can you share the schema of the table(s) involved and an example or two of
> the updates being executed?
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean Baro | 2019-07-30 00:06:57 | Re: High concurrency same row (inventory) |
| Previous Message | Michael Lewis | 2019-07-29 18:12:23 | Re: High concurrency same row (inventory) |