From: | Jagmohan Kaintura <jagmohan(at)tecorelabs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tim Cross <theophilusx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Encryption of Data Specific to a Tenant in PostgreSQL database | General Idea |
Date: | 2021-02-11 04:09:36 |
Message-ID: | CA+cYFtv8ygv2ZpUX1jnhMF-i1RPmA1GGT1wiT5VugV2D4EG0kQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tim,
Yeh datatype is even not supported right now. As tenantId is numeric and
encryption/decryption would go through text/bytea , so even tougher to
encrypt that column data.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:38 AM Tim Cross <theophilusx(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Jagmohan Kaintura <jagmohan(at)tecorelabs(dot)com> writes:
>
> > HI All,
> >
> > For POstgreSQL database to store data for multiple tenants, the approach
> > decided was to have
> > Shared Database (Holding data for all tenants)
> > => Data would be segregated on basis of some additional column
> > (tennatid,different tenants having different tenantId)
> > => Data would be accessed through Views on the basis of
> tenantId
> > value.
> >
> > This is the basic process of most of the customers who are trying to
> > implement multiple tenants in PostgreSQL, rather than choosing
> > separate databases for each tenant.
> >
> > Now we need to encrypt the data related to a tenantId, so that now one
> > knows this data belongs to which tenant even from Operations group.
> > Is there a method in POstgreSQL for encrypting data with different keys
> > with respect to different values in a single column. Moreover pg_crypto
> > will impose a single key on the column.
> >
> > Please share your thoughts in which direction i can start analysing this
> > area for encryption of data specific to a tenant.
> >
>
> The decision to have all tenants in a single database seems rather
> unusual to me. Isolating one tenant from adversely impacting another
> would seem complicated and I'm not sure how you would implement a clear
> security model. Your model has effectively bypassed all the provided PG
> facilities for isolation of data. Disaster recovery and business
> continuity planning under this model must be a nightmare!
>
> I doubt you can adopt a solution which is solely within the database.
> How would the database know which key to use for which rows of data? How
> would you select the data for your tenant views if all that data is
> encrypted with different keys? How would you manage these keys in a
> secure manner?
>
> With the model you have adopted, I would be looking at performing
> encryption/decryption at the client level. However, depending on your
> data types, this could be challenging. this is really a requirement
> which should have been factored into the initial architecture design.
> Anything you try to bolt on now is likely to be complex and have
> significant performance impact and that is assuming you can re-interpret
> the requirement to make the objective feasible.
>
> --
> Tim Cross
>
>
>
--
*Best Regards,*
Jagmohan
Senior Consultant, TecoreLabs.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aditya Toshniwal | 2021-02-11 05:29:40 | Re: Connecting to database through username,passphrase and private key on PgAdmin |
Previous Message | Jagmohan Kaintura | 2021-02-11 04:08:33 | Re: Encryption of Data Specific to a Tenant in PostgreSQL database | General Idea |