| From: | Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cut 42.1.5 now and start merging for 42.2.0? |
| Date: | 2017-11-03 14:04:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+cVU8OkJurdocJtB6UFneF7+uL1q5XAKVW5yzfb0KzWUBeW9Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Don't worry Dave, I know both might be busy, there is no urgency.
If I can help in the review/approval process let me know.
Jorge Solórzano
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
>
> sorry for the late reply. I think both Vladimir and I are just busy. I
> know he's at a conf in St Petersburg (or Moscow)
>
> I don't think there is any urgency ?
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
> On 2 November 2017 at 12:09, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave, the merging (review) of PRs has been a bit slow, is there
>> anything that I can do, to make the process faster?
>>
>> Jorge Solórzan
>> o
>>
>>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jorge Solórzano | 2017-11-03 14:17:19 | Re: Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2017-11-03 11:53:05 | Does the JDBC connection failover require Postgres 10? |