| From: | Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Date: | 2015-05-27 22:53:57 |
| Message-ID: | CA+bfosHdseEgwX0qOqebbbdRYuC4yjt7PCk777ecgbHNqNWDbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:21 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> I think a patch like this should be able to fix it ... not tested yet.
>
Thanks Alvaro. I got a compile error, so looked for other uses of
SimpleLruDoesPhysicalPageExist and added MultiXactOffsetCtl, does this look
right?
+ (!InRecovery || SimpleLruDoesPhysicalPageExist(MultiXactOffsetCtl,
pageno)))
It compiled then, but it didn't seem to change anything: postgres gave the
same errors and still would not start up.
I'm recompiling it now just to be sure I didn't make any mistakes. I have
to leave for the day in a few minutes so I thought I'd check on the above
argument with you. Thanks again!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2015-05-28 00:48:43 | Re: Python 3.2 XP64 and Numpy... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-27 22:21:58 | Re: Constraint exclusion not working - need different constraints? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-27 22:55:28 | Re: problems on Solaris |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-05-27 22:21:42 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |