On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> Not really. Your best bet is to reduce the
> autovacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age limit, so that vacuums are able to
> get rid of multixacts sooner (and/or reduce
> autovacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age, so that whole-table vacuuming
> takes place earlier).
Thank you very much. I will adjust those settings. Is there a way,
something similar to keeping an eye on `age(relfrozenxid)`, that I can
watch this and keep an eye on it before it becomes a problem?