Re: GIN Trigram Index Size

From: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
To: Christian Ramseyer <rc(at)networkz(dot)ch>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN Trigram Index Size
Date: 2015-09-14 14:34:23
Message-ID: CA+bJJbyMbn_z_Xnn6VCphJ6mc1yft=dbXfq8JDaVTgwYm+ALqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Christian:

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Christian Ramseyer <rc(at)networkz(dot)ch> wrote:
> I agree with your append-only and disposable partition approach, it
> would work a lot better. The idea with using a second schema for
> selective backups is great, I'll totally steal this :)

Feel free. Just remember if you use redirection trigers/rules for
insert into the partitions it may lead to problems ( I do not normally
have them as I either use a partition aware dedicated inserter or zap
the archived tables from rules, as I only insert for the current date,
maintenance updates are done directly in the partitions ).

Francisco Olarte.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ingmar Brouns 2015-09-14 15:11:52 issue, dumping and restoring tables with table inheritance can alter column order
Previous Message Jan de Visser 2015-09-14 14:02:09 Re: Ubuntu installed postgresql password failure