From: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sam Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com> |
Cc: | Vijaykumar Jain <vijaykumarjain(dot)github(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bottom / top posting |
Date: | 2021-06-07 17:53:30 |
Message-ID: | CA+bJJbxAG8L2PyPsKpEeh4OMn1Gar=RTz7CxYdpvAFrM54LD+g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sam:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:20 PM Sam Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com> wrote:
> It could probably be argued that the prohibition was more relevant in the days before 99% of users read their email via clients which hide quoted content unless it is explicitly expanded. Arguably, smarter digesting software which strips out unnecessary quotations of earlier posts from beneath top-posted content would be a more effective solution now that it is no longer common netiquette (nor all that necessary) to avoid top posting.
I, personally, do not have a problem with the space, I use a 4k, gmail
collapses it AND stopping reading things like unnecessarily quoted
messages, signatures and CO2 emitting eco recomendations to avoid
printing as become nearly automatic. My problem is I can understand a
message like yours in 5-10 seconds, properly scanning a top posted one
takes much longer. So normally I stop reading at the quote and discard
the message if I have not understood with what I have read UNLESS it's
from my mother or I'm been paid to read it.
I find top-posting moderately offensive, like saying "I am not going
to waste time to make your reading experience better".
Francisco Olarte.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Francisco Olarte | 2021-06-07 18:02:33 | Re: bottom / top posting |
Previous Message | Rich Shepard | 2021-06-07 17:43:33 | Re: Database issues when adding GUI |