Re: pg_dump fundenental question

From: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
To: "J(dot) Cassidy" <sean(at)jdcassidy(dot)eu>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump fundenental question
Date: 2016-07-05 17:23:27
Message-ID: CA+bJJbww5Xi+_dhA9mjKnzp=WNw+J8KC3rg7COscchK7yb3-Vg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, J. Cassidy <sean(at)jdcassidy(dot)eu> wrote:
> I have hopefully an "easy" question.
> If I issue the pg_dump command with no switches or options i.e.
> /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_dump -v dbabcd > /data3TB/Backup/dbabcd
> Is their any "default" compression involved or not? Does pg_dump talk to
> zlib during the dump process given that I have not specified any compression
> on the > command line? (see above).

IIRC no options means you are requesting an SQL-script. Those are not
compressed, just pipe them through your favorite compressor. ( In a
later message you stated you were in Linux and had a 324Gb file, and
could head/tail it, have you done so? ).

> Your considered opinions would be much appreciated.

OTOH, with those big backup I would recommend using custom format (
-Fc ), it's much more flexible ( andyou can have the sql script but
asking pg_restore to generate it if you need it, but not the other way
round ).

Francisco Olarte.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J. Cassidy 2016-07-05 17:39:03 Re: pg_dump fundenental question
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-07-05 17:22:03 Re: pg_dump fundenental question