From: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Anil Menon <gakmenon(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Referencing serial col's sequence for insert |
Date: | 2014-07-24 17:05:17 |
Message-ID: | CA+bJJbwX8eDAh-dRSzTrW9i8ugs4oDz5FpGfhETG6yY70PZbCA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Anil:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Anil Menon <gakmenon(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
...
> . It's that itch to drink deep from the fountain of knowledge.
Beware of hyponatremia, and keep in mind it can change in the future.
But you'll surely learn a lot.
> I really do like
> Laurenz Albe's advice of using WITH() AS which seems to be the best practice
> I can ask the developers to follow as it eliminates a lot of uncertainties
> and db specific behavior - and seems like a best practice even for other
> DBs.
Yep, that is the kind of thing I use in production too. These kind of
queries are predictable and easy to build and test incrementally.
Regards.
Francisco Olarte.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-07-24 17:12:05 | Re: tab_to_sting |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-07-24 15:14:48 | Re: tab_to_sting |