Re: Top posting....

From: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
To: George Neuner <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Top posting....
Date: 2017-05-12 09:03:16
Message-ID: CA+bJJbw0VF=ZvXaFeFgEMhHDJZFX7W1v46eBKrDBVSO-pe2JKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

George:

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:23 AM, George Neuner <gneuner2(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote:

> I agree 100%. But excessive brevity can make it so a reader can't
> follow the conversation. Users of web forums often assume *you* can
> easily look back up the thread because *they* can. In my experience,
> it isn't always easy to do.

Excessive = too much, normally implies bad things.

Francisco Olarte.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Goodson 2017-05-12 15:13:09 EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 2 - compilation issues.
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2017-05-12 06:12:29 Re: Top posting....