From: | Atira Odhner <aodhner(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [patch] RM2163 emboldened syntax highlighting |
Date: | 2017-02-09 13:52:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+Vc24pvACuB3Tb-+dCUnH_parWQ8i9Fs7NBTmRQ2hJx=iVAjQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Good point! I guess I was asleep at the wheel on this one. I didn't notice
it was a library.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017, 4:37 AM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala
> <murtuza(dot)zabuawala(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's not a good idea to directly change in main Library, Lets say if
> newer
> > version of CodeMirror available and we want to pull new version then we
> need
> > to maintain this change set every time we pull new version.
> >
> > Instead please use,
> >
> > web/pgadmin/static/css/overrides.css
> >
> >
> > or more specifically if you are only targeting Syntax highlighting for
> Query
> > Tool then,
> >
> > web/pgadmin/tools/sqleditor/static/css/sqleditor.css
> >
> >
> > to override any CSS related changes specific to pgAdmin4.
>
> Agreed - we only modify bundled libraries when there is no other
> choice, and then we add a README explaining what was changed and why.
>
> In this case, I think the changes should be in overrides.css which is
> intended specifically for overriding styles in the third party
> libraries (yes, I know there are a few things in there that should be
> in pgadmin.css - we need to clean that up somewhen). They should not
> be for the SQL Editor only.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Atira Odhner | 2017-02-09 14:20:51 | Re: Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP) |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2017-02-09 13:26:44 | Re: Acceptance Tests against a browser (WIP) |