Re: Feature test regression failures

>
>
> Maybe - I'd need to see a viable patch with minimal impact first though.

Sure, makes sense.

That'll only work to a point. What happens if the user installs a
> plugin to get some additional functionality? We still need the ability
> to ensure code can be added to an existing installation.

We can definitely set it up where that won't be an issue. It will probably
be up to the plugin developer to do minification of the plugin's
javascript, or the plugin javascript can simply work unminified.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Atira Odhner <aodhner(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
> >> A change as large as moving to React will be for v2.x, not v1.x, so we
> >> cannot really wait unless we want to write off the feature tests as
> >> unusable for the forseeable future.
> >
> >
> > I don't think we should wait on moving the entire codebase to react
> before
> > releasing features that use it. React allows us to implement things
> > piecemeal so for example we can implement this tree in react and ship
> that
> > as a fully functional user-facing change. Over time we can introduce more
> > components in react while still having a working product.
>
> Maybe - I'd need to see a viable patch with minimal impact first though.
>
> We've already broken many of the normal rules we play by with pgAdmin
> 4 by cutting releases from the master branch rather than keeping a
> stable branch with only bug fixes in it, and I'm extremely wary about
> shipping largely non-essential changes in a minor update without being
> able to do the level of QA we would for a major release. The risk to
> the user and to our reputation is too high.
>
> >> I'm tinkering with ideas for optimising the code we ship to users in
> >> my spare time. This isn't something I'm prioritising. If you're
> >> working on similar ideas, please do share.
> >
> >
> > The best practice for using React is to use a preprocessing pipeline so
> > we'll definitely share that as we get it set up. We will definitely be
> doing
> > minification and bundling code into a single file.
>
> That'll only work to a point. What happens if the user installs a
> plugin to get some additional functionality? We still need the ability
> to ensure code can be added to an existing installation.
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>