Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

From: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date: 2024-08-22 08:59:47
Message-ID: CA+VUV5rAx_6OuaSWPSi15=Cw2daFRx3Rw0HxpT2aCVyZNCWy5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Jelte,

On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 at 09:32, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:

> It looks like you want one directory per extension, so that list would
> get pretty long if you have multiple extensions. Maybe (as a follow up
> change), we should start to support a * as a wildcard in both of these
> GUCs. So you could say:
>
> SET extension_search_path = /mnt/extensions/pg16/*
>
> To mean effectively the same as you're describing above.
>

That'd be great. +1.

--
Gabriele Bartolini
Vice President, Cloud Native at EDB
enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-08-22 09:00:00 RISC-V animals sporadically produce weird memory-related failures
Previous Message Gabriele Bartolini 2024-08-22 08:58:45 Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions