From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reduced power consumption in WAL Writer process |
Date: | 2011-07-14 09:42:03 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLvkZX94BQu+DFriz+9+wa3CzqQLqDSeoEW9-TZrOGGCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Currently walwriter might write out the WAL before a transaction commits.
> IOW, walwriter tries to write out the WAL in wal_buffers in every wakeups.
> This might be useful for long transaction which generates lots of WAL
> records before commit. So we should call SetLatch() in XLogInsert() instead
> of RecordTransactionCommit()? Though I'm not sure how much walwriter
> improves the performance of synchronous commit case..
Yeh, we did previously have a heuristic to write out the WAL when it
was more than half full. Not sure I want to put exactly that code back
into such a busy code path.
I suggest that we set latch every time the wal buffers wrap.
So at the bottom of AdvanceXLInsertBuffer(), if nextidx == 0 then
SetLatch on the WALWriter.
That's a simple test and we only check it if we're switch WAL buffer page.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-07-14 09:53:09 | Re: Reduced power consumption in WAL Writer process |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2011-07-14 09:41:27 | Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build |