Re: Standalone synchronous master

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date: 2014-01-08 17:39:23
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLpUcqsL0oyjnd68W0e6o00r8vQ=DNk4H8s4zeOFhbnwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 January 2014 09:07, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:

> I'm going to say right off the bat that I think the whole notion to
> automatically disable synchronous replication when the standby goes down is
> completely bonkers.

Agreed

We had this discussion across 3 months and we don't want it again.
This should not have been added as a TODO item.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-01-08 17:42:26 Re: [PATCH] Support for pg_stat_archiver view
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2014-01-08 17:36:22 Re: Specifying both recovery_target_xid and recovery_target_time