From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Date: | 2013-02-09 09:25:14 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLfAWhYps3pagKg-x5A7Z5WT9GFg=pV5cAaMKmnG5pmUg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 8 February 2013 10:23, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> to solve two problems:
>>
>> 1. maximize the efficiency of existing reviewer time
>>
>> 2. make tooling not be an obstacle to getting new reviewers
>
> I think you are missing a fundamental part in this - which is "0.
> don't negatively affect the efficiency of existing committer time".
Agreed.
Process improvement is very important, but not more important than the
process itself.
What is the developer meeting for if not this discussion?
Let's do some patch reviews and commits now and save the
lets-make-it-better stufff for later.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2013-02-09 09:36:03 | Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree |
Previous Message | Miroslav Šimulčík | 2013-02-09 09:13:23 | Re: function for setting/getting same timestamp during whole transaction |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-02-11 20:12:09 | Re: almost hidden placement of release support policy |
Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2013-02-09 06:55:40 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |