| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review of Row Level Security |
| Date: | 2012-12-23 13:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLbQdb1JswNm3PWJJ1+egT_W0SdyRwtGPRirOoutQcUZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 December 2012 20:13, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> wrote:
> I apologize again for coming in so late with strong opinions, but I
> thought I knew what "row level security" meant, and it was just a
> question of how to do it, but I can't reconcile what I thought the
> feature was about with the patch I'm seeing; perhaps it's just a
> lack of the hight level context that's making it difficult.
Agreed, I think we're all feeling that. I'll do my best to accommodate
all viewpoints.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2012-12-23 14:29:00 | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-12-23 13:33:15 | Re: pg_basebackup from cascading standby after timeline switch |