From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
Date: | 2012-04-05 20:27:30 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLZz2B0+eaZa0RVkViEWzPc4NaqBA+gVbRFJe3A69s=zw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I am speaking up now as this is the first time I am told I have to wait
>> another year for this feature to arrive.
>
> Really? You've never seen a patch punted to the next release before
> because it wasn't robust enough? Considering that I see your name
> mentioned in the 8.2 release notes, I find that a bit hard to believe.
Hannu didn't say he hadn't seen a patch punted. He said this was the
first time he knew he would have to wait another year for the feature
to arrive.
It's shocking since after months of work and an especially extended
edition CF, we expect people to deliver something, not just shunt the
whole thing off as rejected with 1 days's notice to alter that
outcome. Of course nobody can alter the outcome with such short
notice.
I don't care to hear the reasons, cos such excuses aren't good enough,
whoever they come from.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-04-05 20:38:21 | Re: Last gasp |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2012-04-05 19:56:25 | Re: Last gasp |