Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation
Date: 2011-10-11 21:32:52
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLZYB8siC+YDZL=Gg1UBPf16Li2Htt4xioE0QXfYa3n0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> How could I change the viewpoint of the group without making rational
>> arguments when it matters?
>
> Well, you make your arguments, and you see if you convince anybody.
> On these specific points, you've failed to sway the consensus AFAICT,
> and at some point you have to accept that you've lost the argument.

I'm happy to wait more than 4 hours before trying to judge any
meaningful consensus.

Rushing judgement on such points is hardly likely to encourage people
to speak up, even assuming they have the opportunity.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-11 21:35:41 Re: pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2011-10-11 21:30:32 Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation