Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)
Date: 2011-08-01 11:35:26
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLJA18=jUz_kuiEDkH6sjfY3bSH6=pvdbV3mC+327GSkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

>> Does the order of locking of the buffers matter? I'm sure it does.
>
> Yep.

Do you mean that the BlockNumbers are already in correct sequence, or
that you will be adding this code to redo?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2011-08-01 12:01:29 Re: Access to current database from C-language function
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2011-08-01 11:32:59 Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)