From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted |
Date: | 2013-02-07 20:23:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLBN4eO7uVQ7p0CeOafA8ekVViAGVGsB5bE=NVaNKxQGw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 February 2013 19:15, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Pavan Deolasee
> <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Right. I don't have the database handy at this moment, but earlier in
>> the day I ran some queries against it and found that most of the
>> duplicates which are not accessible via indexes have xmin very close
>> to 2100345903. In fact, many of them are from a consecutive range.
>
> Does anyone have suggestions on how to hack the system to make it
> fast-forward the current transaction id? It would certainly make
> testing this kind of thing faster if I could make transaction id
> increment by 100 each time a new one is generated. Then wrap-around
> could be approached in minutes rather than hours.
This is a variation of one of the regression tests...
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION burn_xids (n integer)
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $$
BEGIN
IF n <= 0 THEN RETURN; END IF;
PERFORM burn_xids(n - 1);
RETURN;
EXCEPTION WHEN raise_exception THEN NULL; END;
$$;
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-07 20:32:16 | Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-07 20:11:40 | Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted |