Re: Deprecating RULES

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deprecating RULES
Date: 2012-10-12 06:47:26
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLB=F8vYaXST1RY4SS5hTo6E=6apRVN_wTMDUSvz64Jyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12 October 2012 01:52, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> I'm with Tom and Josh and Daniel on this, and to be honest I'm somewhat
> surprised at the willingness of some people to spring surprises on users.

I've never caused nor argued in favour of hardcoded changes that catch users.

This would be a documented change and one that is alterable, should
the user wish.

So your comments don't apply.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-10-12 06:55:49 Re: Deprecating RULES
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-10-12 06:42:24 Re: Deprecating RULES