Re: BDR-project

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BDR-project
Date: 2014-01-08 17:57:52
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLADPZFK6U2JNw+H1-DZRw=2i+iR0Acr0e+PX4zf2r+4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25 December 2013 12:01, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> wrote:

> Ref:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/BDR_Project
>
> Is implementing main BDR features into core Postgres a probable objective to
> version 9.4?

I've not updated hackers recently on this point, so thanks for asking
the question. This was discussed in the ending keynote of the PG
Europe conference, but I appreciate that's not the same thing as
saying it here.

The plan is

* submit the core logical replication technology for 9.4
* submit online upgrade as a feature for 9.5, allowing upgrades from 9.4+
* submit full BDR features for 9.6

BDR code will be released as a separate open source project until/if
core accepts/modifies that. There's lots of work and discussion to be
had yet, so the above plan is a reasonable schedule for achieving
change allowing input from all. Design to full feature submission
would be 4.5 years, plus we expect the features to mature/extend after
that, so there's no rush, just steady movement.

No attempts to publicise that as yet, but if all goes well we expect
to do that once 9.4 is released.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

  • BDR-project at 2013-12-25 12:01:03 from Andreas Joseph Krogh

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2014-01-08 18:10:24 WIP patch: improve documentation for user defined final functions of aggregates
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2014-01-08 17:56:00 Re: [PATCH] Support for pg_stat_archiver view