From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GetLockConflicts() and thus recovery conflicts seem pretty broken |
Date: | 2015-01-29 14:39:53 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKyfyPZMcq9EpFUw-xn63qaeYnVyt9kma=KdxS8DBvmFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27 January 2015 at 14:27, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> While investigating other bugs I noticed that
> ResolveRecoveryConflictWithLock() wasn't really working. Turns out
> GetLockConflicts() violates it's API contract which says:
>
> * The result array is palloc'd and is terminated with an invalid VXID.
>
> Problem 1:
> We don't actually put the terminator there. It happens to more or less
> accidentally work on a master because the array is palloc0()ed there and
> while a 0 is valid backend id it happens to not be a valid local
> transaction id.
Yes, we should put the terminator there.
> In HS we don't actually allocate the array every time,
> but it's instead statically allocated. Without zeroing.
> Problem 2:
> Since bcd8528f001 and 29eedd312274 the "the result array is palloc'd" is
> wrong because we're now doing:
>
> static VirtualTransactionId *vxids;
> /*
> * Allocate memory to store results, and fill with InvalidVXID. We only
> * need enough space for MaxBackends + a terminator, since prepared xacts
> * don't count. InHotStandby allocate once in TopMemoryContext.
> */
> if (InHotStandby)
> {
> if (vxids == NULL)
> vxids = (VirtualTransactionId *)
> MemoryContextAlloc(TopMemoryContext,
> sizeof(VirtualTransactionId) * (MaxBackends + 1));
> }
> else
> vxids = (VirtualTransactionId *)
> palloc0(sizeof(VirtualTransactionId) * (MaxBackends + 1));
>
> Obviously that violates the API contract. I'm inclined to rip the HS
> special case out and add a pfree() to the single HS caller.
Agreed. Removing special purpose code seems like a good idea.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, RemoteDBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marco Nenciarini | 2015-01-29 14:47:58 | File based Incremental backup v8 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-01-29 13:47:50 | Re: Possible typo in create_policy.sgml |