From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node |
Date: | 2012-06-19 21:39:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKx389pf30di52x9=UcYUihe0yCpPqr7CjE1cRnAhDqYg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 June 2012 04:58, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 13 June 2012 19:28, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> This adds a new configuration parameter multimaster_node_id which determines
>>> the id used for wal originating in one cluster.
>>
>> Looks good and it seems this aspect at least is commitable in this CF.
>>
>> Design decisions I think we need to review are
>>
>> * Naming of field. I think origin is the right term, borrowing from Slony.
>
> I have not read too deeply here, so maybe I am missing
> some important detail here, but idea that users need
> to coordinate a integer config parameter globally does not
> sound too attractive to me.
>
> Why not limit integers to local storage only and map
> them to string idents on config, UI and transport?
Yes, that can be done. This is simply how the numbers are used
internally, similar to oids.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-19 21:39:46 | Re: Backport of fsync queue compaction |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-19 21:38:52 | Re: performance regression in 9.2 when loading lots of small tables |