Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM
Date: 2012-10-10 12:36:06
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKjMqUJDXxHKec9duMvPxBGPDL4r0ys=Gd9SP3gXyABMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 October 2012 11:41, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:

> Thoughts on that?

I think there has been enough discussion of md5 problems elsewhere
that we should provide an alternative.

If we can agree on that bit first, we can move onto exactly what else
should be available.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-10-10 13:12:15 Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review]
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2012-10-10 12:33:08 Is there a good reason why PL languages do not support cstring type arguments and return values ?