| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Skip checkpoint on promoting from streaming replication |
| Date: | 2012-10-18 22:19:02 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKh1q_68p_us4cLukGcW9NgKghqZqaefMnjJkVEn+FKvg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18 October 2012 21:22, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> This patch seems to have been neglected by both its submitter and the
> reviewer. Also, Simon said he was going to set it
> returned-with-feedback on his last reply, but I see it as needs-review
> still in the CF app. Is this something that is going to be reconsidered
> and resubmitted for the next commitfest? If so, please close it up in
> the current one.
I burned time on the unlogged table problems, so haven't got round to
this yet. I'm happier than I was with this.
I'm also conscious this is very important and there are no later patch
dependencies, so there's no rush to commit it and every reason to make
sure it happens without any mistakes. It will be there for 9.3.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2012-10-18 22:42:55 | Re: [PATCH] Prefetch index pages for B-Tree index scans |
| Previous Message | Любен Каравелов | 2012-10-18 21:58:42 | Re: Deprecating RULES |