Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: basic pgbench runs with various performance-related patches
Date: 2012-01-23 15:35:12
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKX4+vY=B4gXYtw-a+HH8XKkzcHY1YhKSuCAOuBMWp3+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I'm working on it.

Good, thanks for the update.

>> The remaining patch you tested was withdrawn and not submitted to the CF.
>
> Oh.  Which one was that?  I thought all of these were in play.

freelist_ok was a prototype for testing/discussion, which contained an
arguable heuristic. I guess that means its also "in play", but I
wasn't thinking we'd be able to assemble clear evidence for 9.2.

The other patches have clearer and specific roles without heuristics
(mostly), so are at least viable for 9.2, though still requiring
agreement.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-23 15:39:08 Re: Inline Extension
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-23 15:34:12 Re: Re: Add minor version to v3 protocol to allow changes without breaking backwards compatibility