From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org |
Date: | 2013-04-15 18:49:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKRFBp9vhO_+Y4XJpvd00HDn4P0UDyoNDZ77=Bq8fVypg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 15 April 2013 19:34, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info> wrote:
> Last week, I submitted an article on pg.org (id #1459) about the release
> of ora2pg11. The content is pretty much the same as the mail I sent to
> -announce on the same day :
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/516533D0.2090906@dalibo.info
>
> I see the article is not approved. Did I miss something ? Is there any
> reason for this ?
2ndQuadrant has experienced significant delays in at least 3 cases
also. There is definitely a problem somewhere there.
Perhaps we should make all posts wait the same length of time, to
allow reasonable time to decide whether posts are suitable? 72 hours
seems like a reasonable time for this.
That way it would allow (and require) some planning.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2013-04-15 19:02:05 | Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org |
Previous Message | damien clochard | 2013-04-15 18:34:27 | Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org |