| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vincent de Phily <vincent(dot)dephily(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, benjamin(dot)vialle(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master |
| Date: | 2012-05-07 08:14:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKO-1_ZmvVrGnEK2Run0Q9VLzTU5yGjaqBJEpSKVVhTHA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 7 May 2012 09:01, Vincent de Phily <vincent(dot)dephily(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr> wrote:
> Would be nice to see it added to the documentation (unless I just didn't find
> it ?), as it is quite surprising, and might lead to problems if people expect
> to be able to read sequence values from the slave.
If you think so, please submit a patch. That's how it works here.
> As a bonus question, I guess it would be the same if using synchroneous
> replication ?
Yes
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-05-07 08:19:47 | Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master |
| Previous Message | Vincent de Phily | 2012-05-07 08:01:41 | Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master |