From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf |
Date: | 2014-12-04 13:45:13 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKNuBoGSyohA3tEiDACn6rc1xjYfkhGOeU6_15z1SGvnQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 December 2014 at 22:13, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 02/12/14 18:59, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm a bit late to the party, but wouldn't
>>>>>
>>>>> recovery_target_action = ...
>>>>>
>>>>> have been a better name for this? It'd be in line with the other
>>>>> recovery_target_* parameters, and also a bit shorter than the imho
>>>>> somewhat ugly "action_at_recovery_target".
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, I too think that "recovery_target_action" is a better name.
>>>
>>> I agree.
>>
>>
>> +1.
>>
>
> Here is patch which renames action_at_recovery_target to
> recovery_target_action everywhere.
Thanks; I'll fix it up on Monday.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-12-04 13:45:33 | Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2014-12-04 13:13:17 | Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf |