Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2013-04-22 19:54:40
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKL6kJYCQ75i+vMnM0+X0Zf3DZ4EHYVVjwRrXiUJdjFYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22 April 2013 20:32, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:

> Assuming that we only ship a plain C implementation with 9.3, what
> are we missing on that front? The C implementation of FNV1+SHIFT is
> only a few dozen lines or so.

Forgive me, I can't seem to locate the patch for this? Re-post please,
just for clarity.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ants Aasma 2013-04-22 19:57:31 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-04-22 19:54:36 Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report