Re: synchronized snapshots

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: synchronized snapshots
Date: 2011-10-18 17:32:37
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKF9XP+dx0aNrrj+ZaBE7MrgmbVSnyv=qz4NBJy+uaUrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>> I'm also concerned that we are adding this to the BEGIN statement as
>> the only option.
>
> Huh?  The last version of the patch has it only as SET TRANSACTION
> SNAPSHOT, which I think is the right way.

Sorry Tom, didn't see your name on it earlier, thats not shown on the
main CF display and I didn't think to check on the detail. Please
continue.

I misread the SET TRANSACTION docs changes. Happy with that.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-18 17:35:13 Re: new compiler warnings
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2011-10-18 17:23:11 Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)