From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: synchronized snapshots |
Date: | 2011-10-18 17:32:37 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKF9XP+dx0aNrrj+ZaBE7MrgmbVSnyv=qz4NBJy+uaUrw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm also concerned that we are adding this to the BEGIN statement as
>> the only option.
>
> Huh? The last version of the patch has it only as SET TRANSACTION
> SNAPSHOT, which I think is the right way.
Sorry Tom, didn't see your name on it earlier, thats not shown on the
main CF display and I didn't think to check on the detail. Please
continue.
I misread the SET TRANSACTION docs changes. Happy with that.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-18 17:35:13 | Re: new compiler warnings |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-10-18 17:23:11 | Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1) |