From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid marking buffer dirty when VACUUM has no work to do. |
Date: | 2011-11-22 09:36:52 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKETN2Um8dsPhCm3T-axG_F9PyMmuZrgUArpX4dhrdDZg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Avoid marking buffer dirty when VACUUM has no work to do.
>>> When wal_level = 'hot_standby' we touched the last page of the
>>> relation during a VACUUM, even if nothing else had happened.
>>> That would alter the LSN of the last block and set the mtime
>>> of the relation file unnecessarily. Noted by Thom Brown.
>
>> This doesn't look right to me --- you have not accounted for the
>> possibility that btpo_cycleid or BTP_HAS_GARBAGE is changed.
>
>> Also, I'm confused about the business of not setting the LSN. Thom
>> claimed that he was seeing the page not change at all (or at least
>> md5sum of the file didn't change) despite mtime changing. If we'd
>> been plastering a new LSN on the page each time, then that should
>> certainly not have been possible. So I now think maybe we've
>> mis-analyzed what was happening in his example.
>
>> I think this requires more careful analysis.
>
> Ping? If you don't respond, I'm going to take it on my own authority to
> revert this patch, because it's definitely broken as-is, and I don't
> think the consequences of not updating the page LSN have been thought
> through either.
Tom, waiting across a weekend isn't a cause for concern.
I made that change for you, so am happy to revoke for you also.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-11-22 09:48:54 | pgsql: Continue to allow VACUUM to mark last block of index dirty |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-22 02:32:44 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid marking buffer dirty when VACUUM has no work to do. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2011-11-22 10:56:55 | Re: Allow substitute allocators for PGresult. |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-11-22 09:31:39 | Re: VACUUM touching file but not updating relation |