From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Temporary tables under hot standby |
Date: | 2012-06-08 17:38:19 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKE9N2kQ4=bHd_vPCa_d-Rp82j=rYX76ipkfpef0UU6NA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8 June 2012 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I would be more open to warning people about CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE
> - frankly, it's pretty wonky that we allow that but treat GLOBAL as a
> noise word in this first place. But I'm a little disinclined to have
> the message speculate about what might happen in future versions of
> PostgreSQL. Such predictions don't have a very good track record of
> being accurate.
Agreed.
We should make use of GLOBAL throw an ERROR: feature not yet
implemented, in preparation for what might one day happen. We don't
know the future but we do know the present.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2012-06-08 17:41:33 | Re: New Postgres committer: Kevin Grittner |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-08 17:26:20 | Re: Temporary tables under hot standby |