Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
Cc: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rodrigo E(dot) De León Plicet <rdeleonp(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
Date: 2011-12-08 12:27:22
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKB1EELRSbLdu7rOChx1KA8yU3vJSZBgJvjWFxi6tsWeA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:

> Areas in which Pg seems significantly less capable include:

Please can you explain the features Oracle has in these area, I'm not
clear. Thanks.

> - admission control, queuing and resource limiting to optimally load a
> machine. Some limited level is possible with external pooling, but only by
> limiting concurrent workers.

> - prioritisation of queries or users. It's hard to say "prefer this query
> over this one, give it more resources" or "user A's work always preempts
> user B's" in Pg.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2011-12-08 12:53:45 Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2011-12-08 11:24:21 Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?