Re: GetOldestXmin going backwards is dangerous after all

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GetOldestXmin going backwards is dangerous after all
Date: 2013-02-04 16:33:37
Message-ID: CA+U5nMK9n5qe_9wNysUjUSECnBKfCRGcvazwQP0MjJdaJY8F2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4 February 2013 16:07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Simon, would you revert the vacuum_defer_cleanup_age changes?

Will do

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-02-04 16:43:41 Re: GetOldestXmin going backwards is dangerous after all
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-02-04 16:29:29 Re: [PATCH 4/5] Add pg_xlogdump contrib module