From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench post-connection command |
Date: | 2012-01-13 09:34:05 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMK1p7kDsKXiF++d5soub8assOyNJCXe_qf_L=hQQmxehw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> More like "\once ... any SQL command or meta command here ..."
>>> if we want to extend the scripting language. But I'd be perfectly happy
>>> with a command-line switch that specifies a script file to be run once.
>
>> Once per connection, yes?
>
> Hmmm ... good question. Heikki was speculating about doing CREATE TABLE
> or similar, which you'd want done only once period. But I see no very
> strong reason why cases like that couldn't be handled outside of
> pgbench. So yeah, once per connection.
OK, its a TODO item, but I don't think I'll have time for it for the next CF.
If we need it during testing of other patches then I'll write it.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre C | 2012-01-13 09:48:56 | Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-01-13 09:17:37 | Re: ERRCODE_READ_ONLY_SQL_TRANSACTION |