From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Time-Delayed Standbys |
Date: | 2013-12-12 11:04:17 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMK1Ww0r83aVXwiVMHoADeiKH8qXNGNQq6qzWFXZuBvYtw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12 December 2013 10:42, KONDO Mitsumasa
<kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I agree with your request here, but I don't think negative values are
>> the right way to implement that, at least it would not be very usable.
>
> I think that my proposal is the easiest and simplist way to solve this
> problem. And I believe that the man who cannot calculate the difference in
> time-zone doesn't set replication cluster across continents.
>
>
>> My suggestion would be to add the TZ to the checkpoint record. This
>> way all users of WAL can see the TZ of the master and act accordingly.
>> I'll do a separate patch for that.
>
> It is something useful for also other situations. However, it might be
> going to happen long and complicated discussions... I think that our hope is
> to commit this patch in this commit-fest or next final commit-fest.
Agreed on no delay for the delay patch, as shown by my commit.
Still think we need better TZ handling.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-12-12 11:05:05 | Re: Time-Delayed Standbys |
Previous Message | KONDO Mitsumasa | 2013-12-12 10:57:53 | Re: Optimize kernel readahead using buffer access strategy |