From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Future of our regular expression code |
Date: | 2012-02-18 20:04:53 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJu2UOsWXG3BGcw8q0xkPyS7OcjRMrkvCfY4pNca7O95w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> One immediate consequence of deciding that we are lead maintainers and
> not just consumers is that we should put in some regression tests,
> instead of taking the attitude that the Tcl guys are in charge of that.
> I have a head cold today and am not firing on enough cylinders to do
> anything actually complicated, so I was thinking of spending the
> afternoon transliterating the Tcl regex test cases into SQL as a
> starting point.
Having just had that brand of virus, I'd skip it and take the time
off, like I should have.
Translating the test cases is a great way in for a volunteer, so
please leave a few easy things to get people started on the road to
maintaining that.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Reykja | 2012-02-18 20:16:00 | Re: Future of our regular expression code |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-02-18 20:00:56 | Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results |