Re: Call for Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2012: Project ideas?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
Cc: Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2012: Project ideas?
Date: 2012-03-08 22:05:14
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJp9mEA_0ZV7coKprb+aqtZ_L=vr=ES=--cx8Yebk0_cg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 01:40 PM, Stefan Keller wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I do have a student who is interested in participating at the Google
>> Summer of Code (GSoC) 2012
>> Now I have the "burden" to look for a cool project... Any ideas?
>>
>> -Stefan
>>
>
> How about one of:
>
> 1) on disk page level compression (maybe with LZF or snappy) (maybe not page
> level, any level really)
>
> I know toast compresses, but I believe its only one row.  page level would
> compress better because there is more data, and it would also decrease the
> amount of IO, so it might speed up disk access.
>
> 2) better partitioning support.  Something much more automatic.
>
> 3) take a nice big table, have it inserted/updated a few times a second.
>  Then make "select * from bigtable where indexed_field = 'somevalue'; work
> 10 times faster than it does today.
>
>
> I think there is also a wish list on the wiki somewhere.

Nice ideas

Those aren't projects we should be giving to summer students. I don't
suppose many people could do those things in two months, let alone
people with the least experience in both their career and our
codebase.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ondrej Ivanič 2012-03-08 22:59:22 Re: Synchronous replication + Fusion-io = waste of money OR significant performance boost? (compared to normal SATA-based SSD-disks)?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2012-03-08 20:37:05 Re: A 154 GB table swelled to 527 GB on the Slony slave. How to compact it?