Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE

On 22 May 2012 18:35, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> If I have a customer with 1 database per user, how do they run a query
>> against 100 user tables? It would require 100 connections to the
>> database. Doing that would require roughly x100 the planning time and
>> x100 the connection delay. Larger SQL statements pass their results
>> between executor steps using libpq rather than direct calls.
>
> Why is this hypothetical customer using separate databases?  This really
> seems like a case of "doctor, it hurts when I do this".

Databases are great for separating things, but sometimes you want to
un-separate them in a practical way.

I'm surprised that you're so negative about an ease of use feature. I
had understood you cared about fixing problems experienced by our
developers.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services