From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | mailinglist(at)tdeo(dot)fr |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Conditionnal validation for transaction |
Date: | 2012-03-19 15:57:34 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJUduvL-mTzpEELioXpt1m9wiWBq+uh1eOHQaaYUQGVTA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Florent THOMAS <mailinglist(at)tdeo(dot)fr> wrote:
> Hy all of you,
>
> 1 - Is there a way to have conditions for committing transactions like in
> oracle :
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/42831667/47/Validation-conditionnelle-de-transaction-62
>
> 2 - Is there a way to declare local variables for a SQL statement without
> beiing in a function?
PostgreSQL follows the SQL standard which does not allow anything like that.
Later versions do allow anonymous blocks, also known as DO statements
that allow you to execute some code to allow decision making like
that. So the Oracle example is very similar code in PostgreSQL, except
that you can't issue ROLLBACK and COMMIT. But then you don't need to
because you can do a conditional error or drop through to a commit.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists | 2012-03-19 17:26:13 | Slow information_schema.views |
Previous Message | mgould | 2012-03-19 15:36:34 | Re: Conditionnal validation for transaction |