Re: The case for version number inflation

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation
Date: 2013-02-28 09:29:58
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJT0i+EzU7iAraSbOFKqPF=iSJEvfT1SSQAaUY=BSJ=AA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 28 February 2013 01:02, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> (And please, let's not even think about using a cutesy naming scheme -
> "Excited Elephant", "Flirty Foreign-Key", "Grumpy Groupby" etcetera ;) )

Hilarious. I love the thought of "Excited Elephant".

But seriously, that wouldn't help us at all, and would just work against us.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-02-28 09:37:34 Re: The case for version number inflation
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-02-28 01:31:52 Re: The case for version number inflation